Balisage
The Markup Conference @ Online
2026-08-07
Director of Evolved Binary
UK - Software, Consultancy, Training, and R&D
Co-founder and Co-owner of eXist Solutions
Germany - TEI Publisher software
Software Engineer / Prolific Open Source contributor
Elemental (NoSQL/XMLDB) - Founder
eXist-db - 20 Years as Core contributor (last 9 as main dev.)
RocksDB - 10 Years as RocksJava main developer
W3C XQuery Working Group - Invited Expert
Founder of EXQuery, and creator of RESTXQ
Enjoys Research and Development, and Snowboarding
Photo by Richard Hendrick on Unsplash
Photo by Alan Taylor on Unsplash
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash
- William Edwards Deming
Software* produced by one or more people / agents
Software access / distributed according to OSI: OSD terms
Hard to define!
Shared Ideology?
Community?
Governance?
Financially / Altruistically driven?
Photo by Marc Newberry on Unsplash
* and now many other things
Followed a Vision
Were Built by Humans
Were Used by Humans
Are Filled with Human Emotions
Creativity
Drama
Discussion of Topics
Fast Prototyping of Ideas
Enable Amateurs to build Software
Augment Human Developers with Agentic Team members
Generate Code Faster than Humans
Find (and possibly fix) hard to detect software bugs
Make a developer 10x more productive
Photo by Luis Aguila on Unsplash
For those not financially compensated, many take pleasure in building software
people contribute to FOSS because of fun (91%), altruism (85%), and kinship (80%). - opensource.com 2021
Some pursue the newest technologies (e.g. AI/LLMs)
Interacting with other humans and/or agents is a personal preference
I have a religious exemption from using all generative "A.I.". - Catherine Sawers 2025
Larger social relationships may be formed
Photo by Minh Triet on Unsplash
Current cost of AI Services for the end user is subsidised
Little / No discounting for developing countries or disadvantaged backgrounds
True financial cost of use for AI Services remains unknown for all
Rolling your own AI Services requires significant investment in hardware, utilities, etc.
There are often hidden costs
companies are losing more money today implementing this technology than they were two years ago. - Jim Covello, Goldman Sachs 2026
Photo by William Warby on Unsplash
As individual humans, most of us care about our environment
Organised groups have exploited it for financial gain
AI Hardware and Services have a huge environmental cost
Mining and Manufacture, Rare Earth Metals, Electricty, Water, Transportation, Cooling, Land Acquisition, Light, Water, and Noise Pollution
AI Data Centers by 2030: 3% Global Electricty / 9.3T Litres of Water / 15.5K KM2 Land Use / 2.5M Tonnes of e-Waste
Incompatible with OSS4SG
Photo by Mukovhe Mavhungu on Unsplash
AI/LLMs are not universally available
Export / Import Controls
Corporate owners are registered in Sovereign States
Differing Politics
Individuals - represented? e.g. MPs
Corporate Owners - Political Views / Lobbying
Sovereign States - Governments Change / Foreign Polices Change
Companies can 'crash'
Safety? AI - Kill Switches?
Photo by Todd Morris on Unsplash
This a fluid landscape - mostly being tested in the US Courts at present
Training AI/LLMs
Ingested copyrighted information that was not obtained legally
Companies are having to make large settlements
Use of Open Source licensed code being tested in court
You may not be indemnified; unless you pay for Enterprise plan
Photo by Kimberly Farmer on Unsplash
AI Generated Works (e.g. code)
AI/LLMs cannot own Copyright
Highly likely that you do NOT own the Copyright
Can you legally use AI/LLM generated code
Depends on what the LLM was trained on
Do all copyright/license(s) on the input allow your use?
Depends if you own the Copyright on the generated code
If you don't own the copyright on the output you can't assign it a license
Image generated by ChatGPT - "A cyberpunk version of Salvador Dalí's melting clocks painting"
Can augment or accelerate human development
AI/LLMs generate code at approximately 'Junior Developer' level
Generated code can have quality issues
Every model is wrong more than 30% of the time - Radomir Basta, Suprmind 2026
Project Maintainability
Code Review remains paramount
Increasing volume can be a problem for humans
Frustration with/by Meat Proxy(s) - No Meat Proxy
Photo by Fabian Jones on Unsplash
Open Source Projects are an inherently Human undertaking
Use of AI/LLMs impact humans:
Social, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal, and Technical
Humans/AIs require knowledge to make decisions
Open Source Projects should publish their AI Policy
Humans/AIs can choose a project in full knowledge of its AI Policy
| 🌟 |
|
| 🌟🌟 |
|
| 🌟🌟🌟 |
|
| 🌟🌟🌟🌟 |
|
| 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 |
|